|
Delaware's Occupation License Requirements Harm Workers
In a May 2012 report the Institute for Justice ranked all the
states with regards to barriers to entry to low- and moderate-income
occupations. Delaware had the 42nd most burdensome licensing laws and was the 25th most extensively and onerously licensed state.
The report documents the license requirements for 102 low- and
moderate-income occupations—such as barber, massage therapist and
preschool teacher—across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It
finds that occupational licensing is not only widespread, but also
overly burdensome and frequently irrational.
On average, these licenses force aspiring workers to spend nine
months in education or training, pass one exam and pay more than $200 in
fees. One third of the licenses take more than a year to earn. At least
one exam is required for 79 occupations.
Barriers like these make it harder for people to find jobs and
build new businesses that create jobs, particularly minorities, those of
lesser means and those with less education. With an unemployment rate
hovering around 7%, and even higher for those with less education, these
barriers to occupational entry need to be addressed by the state
legislature.
Does it make sense that Delaware is one of just eight states to
require a license to be a travel agent? Is there a benefit to the public
from Delaware requiring licenses for auctioneers, milk samplers, animal
breeders and fisher persons? Does a cosmetologist really need 350 days
of training and to pass two exams? Or a makeup artist an annual $143
license and to pass two exams? Why does a travel guide in Delaware have
to pay $100 a year to operate?
There are common sense alternatives to licensure. Voluntary
certification through professional associations, for example, can
benefit practitioners by enabling them to distinguish themselves, while
consumers remain free to choose among all providers and decide for
themselves how much value to place on such credentials.
There are also third-party consumer organizations, such as the
Better Business Bureau, and more contemporary versions built on new
information and communication technologies, such as Angie’s List, that
enable consumers to hold occupational practitioners accountable for the
quality of their goods and services. These organizations already help
consumers sort through providers in fields where practitioners are
licensed and in those where they are not.
Bottom line, barbers who give bad haircuts will never develop a
customer base and disappear. This market system for evaluating
occupations has worked well for centuries.
Dr. John E. Stapleford, Director
Center for Economic Policy and Analysis
No comments:
Post a Comment